814138

Global Warming Essay

People have always wanted to do things in the name of progress and innovation and have not dealt with any negative consequences until recently (the past 30 or so years). “Global warming” describes the abnormal heating of the Earth due to an increased amount of Carbon dioxide gas in the atmosphere, and it has been concluded that the bulk of the emissions are because of humans’ inventions and technologies that require energy to create, use, and dispose of. It is imperative for all people ranging from political to scientific to business backgrounds to take the impact of global warming into consideration when making policies because the environment impacts the economy, which all parties have a vested interest in. They must do so by weighing the seriousness of the problem as a whole and in relation to their field, the benefits and drawbacks of their proposed environment friendly plan(s), and the impact of their actions on nations and the global public in general.

While some may argue otherwise, there is enough evidence to prove that global warming is a serious issue worth addressing. Governments have already done so, what with 34 nations signing the Kyoto Protocol, a treaty aimed at reducing gas emissions, and their tracking of changes in the global ocean surface temperatures since 1880 (Source A and B). These actions indicate that people must address global warming because it is important enough that nations are ratifying treaties and the US government is tracking temperatures; things that governments are involved in tend to be important current issues. It is also evident that energy and resources are limited and expensive; advanced technology and research is very costly due to the high energy consumption, and as there are fewer sources of oil and gas (for example), the prices of those commodities increase sharply, thereby affecting the economy (Source C). Especially considering that many nations are either entering or getting out of recessions and money is very tight for the average citizen, fuels are one of the main expenses and people will cut back on other goods such as clothes or certain trips or expensive foods and restaurants. In effect, money circulation will slow down even more. Furthermore, scientists have concluded that the environment is being drastically affected by global warming. According to the scientific theory of uniformitarianism, which states that there are constant forces acting on the Earth and constantly changing its physical landscape. It may be true that the Earth has natural temporal fluctuations, but graphs show that there has been a steeper and steady increase in the average temperatures – hence the term global warming – and there have been numerous recorded changes in animal and wildlife behaviors and habits (Source C and F). For example, robin migrations are not following their travel patterns, woodpeckers’ reproduction times are changing, and plant-life bloom and growth are not following regular patterns either (Source F). Scientists have already shown that global warming is a serious issue, and governments’ actions indicate that global warming is a very big issue. This “issue” also affects businesses and the economy because the environment sustains the economy. The word "issue" is kind of overused in these last two sentences. For the second to last sentence, maybe consider combining the two things so that issue can be used just once; maybe something like 'both the data collected by scientists and the governments' actions indicate that global warming is a serious issue' There will most definitely be some drawbacks if/when conservation policies and methods are introduced and implemented, but the losses will eventually be recovered. Elaborate more on the negatives. All parties need to take action. There are certain industrialized nations such as the US, Australia, and China, who have not signed the Kyoto Protol and are responsible for about one-quarter of gas emissions (Source B and C). It would be in the environment’s and other nations’ best interests if the largest industrial nations that contribute ﻿ the most air pollution are involved because then the amount of carbon gases in the atmosphere will drastically decrease. Governments and businesses should fund scientific research and projects on “fuel-saving technologies and renewable energy” (Source C). Conservation is imperative because there are only so many sources for energy, or oil, or gas, or any other raw materials or goods, and all 194 nations of the world must share them amongst each other. Global warming reduction might be costly (almost $8 billion), but in time many resources and energy-consuming technologies will save time and money. Also, as mentioned in source D, a complete eradication of air pollution is impossible and not pragmatic, but a reduction will maintain the balance between the economy and the environment. HEY LAMIYA!!!!! Already there is governmental support for these plans, and 18 states from the US have set goals reflective of the ideas of the Kyoto Protocol. Saving money and energy is a universal strategy, and consumers love green campaigns because they get eco-friendly products for modest prices and can actively participate. Clothes, bags, cars, and fluorescent light bulbs are only a few of the many examples of things that are becoming eco-friendly and use resources efficiently. It is also important to remember that there are almost 200 nations in the world. i like the fact that you added the reminder. They all have better chances of industrializing and improving the quality of life if they can conserve energy and resources. Therefore, scientists must work towards finding energy efficient and reusable resources, governments and businesses must fund such ventures, and they must also set emission reduction goals and prevent/decrease a waste of resources such as fuels and recyclables. Global warming may never fully be solved and slowed down because there are natural changes in the environment, but it is the human’s duty to preserve nature and its resources while allowing other nations to industrialize. Good concluding on a broad statement.