799894

Global warming is an extremely paradoxical issue. If countries were to continue to keep their economies healthy, they would have to continue industrializing, and emitting greenhouse gases. Every nation strives towards economic stability,but they should also strive towards reducing global warming. Not only should global warming be considered a formidable threat to the global economy, but it should also be treated accordingly by legislators.

Global warming should be considered an issue of concern because of its negative effects. It is the emission of fossil fuels, which accounts ofr nearly three-quarters of carbon dioxide emissions, that has increased the average global temperature by one degree Fahrenheit in the last decade (Source A). As a result, the global environmenet has been changing in tandem with the fluctuating temperature and weather seasson (Source F). Stanford's Center for Envionmental Science and Policy published a study showign that communities of species are having difficulty adapting to the fast-changing global environmental. This failure to adapt, if allowed to fester, will eventually adversely affect ecosystems and vital resources taht humans depend upon.

Thus, global leaders should prioritize on devoting how many resources and to which areas. it is simply not realistic to completely eradicate pollution, but our limited resources can be put forth into fulfilling economic objectives by developing the most efficient, yet environmentally-compatible methods. Applying such methods would ensure that pollution is reduced to an acceptable degree without hindering economic stability. In order to develop the proper technology, coutnries should invest in the green-technology sector (Source D). Global leaders should realize that curbing greenhouse gases will not harm economic welfare because investing in alternative energy research will create another market for the world economy (Source C).

Lastly, world leaders should make implementing emission-cutback policies a priority because such policies would pay dividends in the long-term. While the global environment may still be stable enough that global leaders can afford to delay implementing such measures, negligence over time wil come to harm countries. For example, despite prompoting energy-conservation as a priority in his 2008 campaign, President Obama's administration has yet to sucessfully institute any energy conservation policies thus far. Ratifying the Kyoto protocol, which requires reductions below 1990 levels, would be a basic first step (Source A). However, U.S., China, and Austria, which together account for one-third of the world's emissions, have not ratified the treaty. Although these developed countries may wish to maintain their economy as it is currently (Source E), they need to recongize the foresight of commiting to carbon-emission reductions. Reducing emissions now would only ensure the longevitiy of world economies, not weaken them.